After all that money making fuss regarding pure Cockers this appears. Which is basically what a lot of us were saying all along, I even got chucked off one Farcebook group for mentioning the issue on several occasions. Meantime the working side Cockers has now suffered another huge genetic bottleneck which has done it no favours whatsoever.
Its time the KC put a limit on the number of times a stud dog can be used.
In life, it is important to know when to stop arguing with people and simply let them be wrong.
Hallelujah!!! I wonder if we’ll get an apology now, Judy. .... not holding my breath. More importantly, I wonder if the perpetrator of all this is now man enough to give a public apology to the person he’s been holding a witch hunt against. Not holding my breath for that, either.
Judy wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2020 5:58 pm
Yep Cockergate, I'd done my best to ignore it but when I saw the above link this morning all the nonsense came flooding back into my mind.
My bitch, and i use the term not gender specific has some of the cockergate lines but it never concerned me.... just saying
Muddling along in the hope that one day it starts to make sense.
Miesque wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2020 7:08 pm
Having been banned from a trial result page for mentioning exactly this I'm finding it very amusing!
Yeah, they wouldn’t want to hear from people who really knew what they were talking about.
The confusing part is, having a background in genetics, I was happy to explain better ways of testing to prove what they were looking at was true or false but no one wanted to listen!
Even "O" level Biology passed fifty odd years ago told me that breed purity thing had to be a dubious test. It would be amusing if it weren't so sad for the breed.
In life, it is important to know when to stop arguing with people and simply let them be wrong.