Training an HPR

Discuss any aspect of training you have, ask questions, share tips and advice for any breed of gundog.
trekmoor
Member
Posts: 16074
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 9:38 am
Dogs: Too many and not enough !
Location: Central Scotland

Re: Training an HPR

Post by trekmoor »

Mike, I don't think our HPR's are particularly hard to train. Much of the problem with them is as it has always been in this country.... these breeds got hi-jacked by the pet and show fraternity. Too many dogs were bred to fill the demand for them by people who wouldn't know a good working dog if it jumped up and bit them in the bum !

Some breeds suffered from this more than others , I am thinking of weimaraners here but they were not the only ones. That breeds misfortune was it's unusual colour plus one or two t.v. adverts that had this breed in them. Some really terrible dogs were bred both in terms of temperament and physique. I actually hated weims at one time. The dogs I met were either huge big show bred brutes or were skimpy boned nervous wrecks. Both types, one bred by show folk the other bred for the pet market shared one major fault. They had a streak of aggression towards other dogs and some of them could be aggressive to people too.

The last dog that ever bit me was a weimy bitch belonging to a man who turned up for gundog training classes with a dog he couldn't even begin to control. I had a sneaking admiration for that particular bitch. I felt I'd deserved to be bitten . I showed the man how to control her and she was controlled right up to the point where I tried to pet/praise her for good behaviour ....and that's when she bit me ! :lol: The training classes other pupils were not prepared to continue with that dog in the class however. They took their complaints to the class organiser and the man was told to remove his dog from the ground and not to come back with her. I didn't think she deserved that ....but her owner probably did !

Since then the weim breed has improved a good bit where temperament is concerned but in addition to that faulty temperament very, very few of those dogs were good workers. They could not be taken around shoots with other dogs in case they fought, they were very often hard mouthed and very few of them actually ran while they were hunting. They were and many still are ,plodders. That does not suit our HPR trials which is why I am unlikely to ever compete with the vizsla I have been training.

She too is a bit ploddy on open ground and although she has no other faults that one fault would get her ejected from many trials. She is not alone in this among the vizsla breed but at least she has an excuse ..... she is show and pet bred from stem to stern.

I know a number of people from the retriever trialing world who have tried to train HPR's. Most of them have failed to make much of the dogs even if they bought them from good working stock. They, I think, went too heavily and probably far too soon into training the obedience they thought their pups needed and ended up training the stuffing out of them or, in some cases, turning their dogs into blinkers of game rather than pointers of game .... they were too soon and too hard when training for steadiness to flush ..... I think ?

In short Mike, I blame the people rather than the dogs themselves for most HPR failings here. It's people that breed them ....often never having worked them and people who try to make them into robots .... and unfortunately often succeed at the expense of hunting style . People would not buy cars if they did not have a road to run them on but people do buy HPR's with no ground and no game to train them on.
You might be surprised to learn just how many beginners to HPR 's think they can train hunting, pointing , flushing and steadiness plus retrieving without any access to game at all. They think these dogs will point dummies. :roll:

Wullie
If at first you don't succeed .....find out if there is a booby prize !
-----------------------------------------------------
Don't do what doesn't work - do what does.
.
h&t
Member
Posts: 261
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:18 am
Location: Ontario Canada

Re: Training an HPR

Post by h&t »

I went through similar transition to wullie, on a much smaller scale though :lol:
I agree 100% - the main difference from retrievers or even spaniels to HPRs is independent work (at least here).
But it depends what kind of tests and work you plan for the dog.

BTW, I have Small Munsterlander.
trekmoor
Member
Posts: 16074
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 9:38 am
Dogs: Too many and not enough !
Location: Central Scotland

Re: Training an HPR

Post by trekmoor »

I have never understood the American tests and trial variations even though I have infested their fora for several years now.

Where HPR's are concerned ...what are the differences between the tests and trials ? It reads to me as if tests and trials are very similar in that the birds are planted just before the competitor runs his dog ? This kind of test or trial does not appear to have much, if any, of a retrieve element ?
Then there are completely separate tests , not trials, where these breeds have to show a fairly high level of retrieving ability.....is that correct ?

Could it be said that in striving to provide an equal chance to every competitor these events do not neccessarily find the best "all-round-dog" ..... the most versatile dog, the best HPR ???

Wullie
If at first you don't succeed .....find out if there is a booby prize !
-----------------------------------------------------
Don't do what doesn't work - do what does.
.
Naj
Member
Posts: 7420
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:47 am

Re: Training an HPR

Post by Naj »

But do our trials, Wullie? These dogs are at their best in hunting, & subsequently retrieving, where game is scarce. The problem with field trials is that if you provide ground with enough game to fairly test all the dogs running then there is probably too much, & if there were less then there would probably be not enough. In either case it becomes a bit of a lottery & luck plays a disproportional part in success. :think:

Naj
Cambusvale
Member
Posts: 921
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 4:56 pm

Re: Training an HPR

Post by Cambusvale »

Naj wrote:The problem with field trials is that if you provide ground with enough game to fairly test all the dogs running then there is probably too much, & if there were less then there would probably be not enough. In either case it becomes a bit of a lottery & luck plays a disproportional part in success. :think:

Naj
Would support this in my experience of game on my beats when I trialed, hope its better now.
Ally Learmonth

Riffmuir Kennels
trekmoor
Member
Posts: 16074
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 9:38 am
Dogs: Too many and not enough !
Location: Central Scotland

Re: Training an HPR

Post by trekmoor »

With regard to our own HPR trials I have to agree with you Naj to some extent. I competed in one trial where a pheasant was shot as it sat up a tree to provide a retrieve for a dog. I spectated at another where the total bag consisted of , I think, one partridge, one crow, one farmyard pigeon and a grey squirrel ! Apart from the partridge none of those other creatures come under the heading of game and a handler would be within his rights to refuse to send his dog for them.
I am uncertain about the feral pigeon that was shot ? Are these birds included in the K.C.'s game register ? They were sometimes used during the compulsory water retrieve at the end of Hpr trials, maybe that wasn't "legal" either ? I know I did not like sending my dogs for such birds during Hpr water tests. I never have liked sending my dogs for game that may previously have been retrieved by other dogs especially if I have not had the chance to examine the bird used prior to sending my dog for it. How is a judge supposed to decide whether my dog damaged that bird or if a previous dog, maybe the dog belonging to whoever shot the bird crunched it ?

I competed in a trial where only one dog had a good chance . It pointed a covey of partridge of which only one was shot. My dog and one other dog had several points on snipe ..... and the guns missed every one of them !

Those things happened but when trials did have a fairly good supply of game they were often very good trials to win. The dogs had to hunt well, point well, flush on command with no "stickiness" and then retrieve well. That is the sort of trial I would like to see happen not just here but in America..... I think ? Trials where the dogs have to show they can do the lot all in the one trial.
I can only remember two trials that I competed in where game was too plentiful. Both of those trials were root field trials.

Wullie
If at first you don't succeed .....find out if there is a booby prize !
-----------------------------------------------------
Don't do what doesn't work - do what does.
.
Cambusvale
Member
Posts: 921
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 4:56 pm

Re: Training an HPR

Post by Cambusvale »

Bill

I remember having my dog sent on a marked water retrieve at the end of a novice. They were using pigeon shot that morning as I witnessed the keeper going off and shots being fired in a wood near to the meeting place. Anyway the judge flung the bird in the water with a bit of wrist action and the head became detached from the bird so I had two marks in the water.

As for game I went to a trial and the birds used were Pheaseant poults with one bird put up by a dog flying into a tree and killing itself outright. On a Grouse moor my dog worked a large covey of Grouse to the end of its beat, it got on point and flushed and both guns missed the covey with all four shots from 30 yards. I never saw another Grouse that day. On a further 6 trials I never found game on 12 beats worked, the venues or ground offered then were not the best to see dogs work far as I could see. It was in some cases a long way to journey without the chance to show what your dog could do or complete the hunt, point and retrieve. So a fine dividing line but I would like to have some game to find and in these circumstances more is better than nout.

But trials is a lottery and I often think of Napoleon thoughts on his generals, they could be good or bad or indifferent as long as they were lucky.
Ally Learmonth

Riffmuir Kennels
crackerd
Member
Posts: 1895
Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: Training an HPR

Post by crackerd »

trekmoor wrote:I have never understood the American tests and trial variations even though I have infested their fora for several years now.

Where HPR's are concerned ...what are the differences between the tests and trials ? It reads to me as if tests and trials are very similar in that the birds are planted just before the competitor runs his dog ? This kind of test or trial does not appear to have much, if any, of a retrieve element ?
Then there are completely separate tests , not trials, where these breeds have to show a fairly high level of retrieving ability.....is that correct ?
Wow, your and Cambusvale's latter accounts of HPR trials over there make them sound to be the "red-headed step-child" of gundog sport. The "luck" of good gamey ground doesn't play into NAVHDA tests in N. America - all dogs run the same ground, and all the birds are either liberated or retrieved as cold game. HPR trials likewise, and whereas NAVHDA have a wide array of requirements that test the H, the P, and the R, the trials under the aegis of AKC do little but have the dogs pointing "planted" birds. Retrieving is rudimentary and usually of a bobwhite quail.
Could it be said that in striving to provide an equal chance to every competitor these events do not neccessarily find the best "all-round-dog" ..... the most versatile dog, the best HPR ???
You bet your bottom dollar they don't necessarily find the best all-round dog because the faster dogs are apt to "blow through" a bird field (to reiterate, the same ground is used for all dogs running) and point only one or two birds, whereas a breed like ye olde spinone (or mine) quarters the same field and has almost a dozen "finds" - which means it gets tested to wing, shot and fall on every one of those (not to mention retrieving each) and thus has 10 times the chances to go amiss than a faster, poorer gamefinding HPR.

Even at NAVHDA tests, however, the retrieving is just a notch above rudimentary - a single marked retrieve of a cold duck, retrieving any birds shot over it (which means for a GSP or drahthaar usually one or two birds during the pointing test in NAVHDA), and conceivably the retrieve of a live (but shackled) duck that constitutes NAVHDA's "illustrious" duck search. (Many handlers do not want their dogs catching up to [finding] this duck on the water because a) they will be judged on the retrieve as well as the search, and b) if the dog retrieves the duck faster than the allocated time it's given to "search" for it, it will have to be resent for another duck, a second search, and many HPRs will not go a second time into the water. Thus the easy way out, the dog trails the duck by scent for 10 minutes, never finding it, the judges say "Time" and the handler calls his dog off the duck.)

But them's the rules and everybody plays by them - it's up to the individual handler and luck if you're trying to gin the system to get your "prize" achievement. There are other aspects of the NAVHDA test that make it more worthwhile and equitable - steadiness in and out of a hide, and for all its warts, I'm still partial to the duck search as a fun (and challenging) endeavor.

MG
trekmoor
Member
Posts: 16074
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 9:38 am
Dogs: Too many and not enough !
Location: Central Scotland

Re: Training an HPR

Post by trekmoor »

If an HPR in one of our trials , even at Novice standard, tore through a field and missed birds it would be eliminated even if it did point a couple of them. We like our dogs to "go" but they must always point any birds within the hunted area. Quite often however, but only under some judges, a dog will be allowed perhaps a minute to settle down into it's run. If it misses or bumps game during that minute a judge may decide to let the dog carry on.

Our dogs are not ran against the clock. The judges decide how long a dog should be hunted for more or less as the dog hunts. If a dog is lacking in range or pace it may only get a 10 minute hunt. If the dog is going like the clappers but is not finding, bumping or missing game, the judges will probably give it 5-10 minutes more running time to see if it can find game.
The longest run I ever had was about 25 minutes in a grouse trial with a brittany. She was working very well but there were no birds to be found. The judges kept her hunting until she did find birds. She won that trial.

Wullie
If at first you don't succeed .....find out if there is a booby prize !
-----------------------------------------------------
Don't do what doesn't work - do what does.
.
Naj
Member
Posts: 7420
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:47 am

Re: Training an HPR

Post by Naj »

Perhaps the UK would be better following the Pan European & American format, whereby, as I understand it, dogs must compete in several types of event to earn their titles. So there are spring type pointing tests/Derby without game shot & run along the lines of our pointer/setter trials & then a separate series of trials in the game season where game is shot over the dogs. I think that in the States they also hold separate water/retrieving tests. This would still present problems in that, as pointed out earlier, most handlers simply lack the facilities to do the breed justice. While ever our mainstream British shooting scene revolves around some form of organised shooting I can't see things changing in that respect. At least in the States, & Europe, there is a substantial demand for all breeds of pointing dogs to do this type of work for 'ordinary' hunters. :think:

Naj
Post Reply