Page 5 of 7

Re: The future of working gundogs

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 11:08 am
by trekmoor
There is a rumour going around that new laws have resulted in several shoots packing in and also several game farms. Is there any truth in this ? It could certainly affect the future of working gundogs.

Wullie

Re: The future of working gundogs

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 12:18 pm
by Naj
Now I'm totally lost, Wullie! :lol:

Re: The future of working gundogs

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 12:27 pm
by Judy
Bird flu rules, ok?

Re: The future of working gundogs

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 12:39 pm
by trekmoor
It made sense to me given the title of this thread. :think:
The head picker up of a local estate phoned me last night to ask if I knew about shoot and game farm closures.
I'd heard some shoots were being a bit squeezed financially but was not aware of new legislation ,(taxes ?) being the cause of this. So I thought I'd ask a wummin like Judy coz wummin know everything ! :whistle: :lol:

Wullie

Re: The future of working gundogs

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 1:53 pm
by Contender
trekmoor wrote: ↑Wed Mar 15, 2017 11:08 am There is a rumour going around that new laws have resulted in several shoots packing in and also several game farms. Is there any truth in this ? It could certainly affect the future of working gundogs.

Wullie
:think: :think: What new laws??? If it's with regarding tax and beaters/pickers-up, then nothing has changed only the actual obligation of reporting to HMRC which shoots now have to do - they still don't have to deduct the tax but have to keep records of the beaters/pickers-up that turns up on a shoot day, same rules as for other casual labours. ANY money handed over to anyone has always taxable and should have been declared by people - whether people chose to or not was a different matter :whistle:

Are there any other new rules out?

Natasha

Re: The future of working gundogs

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 2:04 pm
by Naj
... and what's it got to do with the future of working gundogs? :?

Re: The future of working gundogs

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 2:29 pm
by trekmoor
No shoot - no gundogs.

Wullie

Re: The future of working gundogs

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 2:47 pm
by Judy
There's no arguing with that!

I think your mate Nicola has something to do with putting pressure on Scottish Estates, increasing the taxation burden on Sporting Estates? Will find the article and post it.

Re: The future of working gundogs

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 6:25 pm
by Naj
There's more to gundogs than driven shoots! :-D

Don't know what you've heard but there's too much money involved in shooting for it to pack up. It is very much a business these days and as such it is at the whim of demand and supply and there is only a limited amount of money chasing what may have become a glut of shooting days so sone shoots may be pushed out of business as a result of that but this may in turn give rise to smaller diy shoots or roughshoots.

Naj

Re: The future of working gundogs

Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2017 9:42 am
by Nickheref
Judy wrote: ↑Wed Mar 15, 2017 2:47 pm
I think your mate Nicola has something to do with putting pressure on Scottish Estates, increasing the taxation burden on Sporting Estates? Will find the article and post it.
Thats what I thought, anything to stop the toffs massacring the wildlife and she will need to raise some cash, sporting rates here you go.
Back to gundogs I agree with Naj, I think the rise of heavily stocked shooting land has in many ways worked against the sort of dogs I like, I have yet to hear of a beater getting b*****d because it was thought that their dog did not find every bird on the beat but plenty for having a dog who got out of control and so most people neither want nor really need a hard going gamefinder who doesn't need scent to keep it hunting and probably wouldn't thank you for providing them with one, calling them mad or difficult - the one thing that really (ok there is more than one thing if truth be told :lol: ) annoys me is meeting people who see my dogs and laughing say "oh we had a springer, they are mad aren't they".