Page 7 of 29
Re: Credible Cockers!
Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 9:12 pm
by Judy
Roach backed Spaniels are as good as Queen Anne legged, anathema to anyone who like to see a business-like, efficient working dog. If you want a roach backed breed buy a Whippet. I did mention a while back that there were too many roach-backed Cockers in photos of Trialling dogs, I seem to remember being shouted down for that comment too! Does winning make us blind to faults much as the Show people have managed to evolve awful dogs for similar reasons?
Merry Christmas everyone!
Re: Credible Cockers!
Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 9:49 pm
by Naj
Erlandson would turn in his grave!
Re: Credible Cockers!
Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 9:54 pm
by Dawnrazor
Strathcraig wrote:
I was helping a friend look for a Springer stud dog and I was recommended to look at dogs with a "nice roach back" by an A Panel judge
Well, either he had one with a roachy back or his mate had!!!
Re: Credible Cockers!
Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 9:55 pm
by Dawnrazor
Naj wrote:Erlandson would turn in his grave!
Over half the people at a spaniel trial these days would ask if he plays for Man Utd!!!
Re: Credible Cockers!
Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 10:11 pm
by Strathcraig
Dawnrazor wrote:Strathcraig wrote:
I was helping a friend look for a Springer stud dog and I was recommended to look at dogs with a "nice roach back" by an A Panel judge
Well, either he had one with a roachy back or his mate had!!!
Aye he did actually lol
Re: Credible Cockers!
Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 10:28 pm
by Dawnrazor
Ha!! Knew it!!!
Re: Credible Cockers!
Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 10:30 pm
by Dawnrazor
Judy wrote:Roach backed Spaniels are as good as Queen Anne legged, anathema to anyone who like to see a business-like, efficient working dog. If you want a roach backed breed buy a Whippet. I did mention a while back that there were too many roach-backed Cockers in photos of Trialling dogs, I seem to remember being shouted down for that comment too! Does winning make us blind to faults much as the Show people have managed to evolve awful dogs for similar reasons?
Merry Christmas everyone!
The roach back cockers Judy, that'll be all the springer blood in them!!!
Merry Christmas

Re: Credible Cockers!
Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 10:57 pm
by Sgurr
I lead a very sheltered life and I have not to my knowledge bred a roach back Springer - nor have I bought one in.
The worst case of Queen Anne, total malformation not just a bend, I have seen was from a pup of Moonreed Flush - but there was apparently an accidental mating by him (dam hip scored and total in single figures) and the pups were OK.
Rothievale's earlier comments re hips and roach - my Glen is half brother 4/3 and to my Zane 3/3 and to her Moss 5/3, and Edgegrove's Kevin 3/2 and I don't think any of them are roach backed but a lot of different dam lines.
Glen has pups 3/3, 3/3, 4/4 and one at 16 total that was a boat dog. Zane has pups FCI A and 4/4.
I'd say Glen is old fashioned (5 gen Rytex Clear) and Zane is Art and Tweed both sides - modern.
Re: Credible Cockers!
Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 11:59 pm
by Naj
Dawnrazor wrote:Naj wrote:Erlandson would turn in his grave!
Over half the people at a spaniel trial these days would ask if he plays for Man Utd!!!

it's sad, really.
Re: Credible Cockers!
Posted: Sun Dec 25, 2016 9:29 am
by Stacia
I have always thought it cruel to breed a roach back dog, just so it looks 'good' hunting.