Improving the breed..........

Questions and discussions on breeding your dogs
User avatar
elcourtbayspringers
Member
Posts: 208
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 8:46 pm
Dogs: Bella, Bay, Pip, Blossom, Teal
Location: Northants
Contact:

Re: Improving the breed..........

Post by elcourtbayspringers »

OMG your a brave man :lol:

I can understand your sentiments but it would never work, and I agree I have seen some crap spaniels, obviously bred with not a thought given to its conformation, intelligence, etc etc etc, I sometimes wonder what on earth these people were thinking of when they bred them...............money I suppose. :roll:

But on the other side of the coin there are breeders like myself, I don't trial any more, my bitches don't have FTW or FTCH , BUT I have been very choosey when buying, they work their socks off in their relevant disciplines and I would be proud to work them anywhere.
I am ultra choosey as to the Sire, as the pups I want to breed need to have the characteristics needed to make a good drugs/explo etc dog, I want to have a fair idea of what they are going to look like and most importantly to me, if the sire suits my bitch size, conformation, attitude etc and will hopefully add something to the line.
ARe you saying in your scenario I would be banned from breeding? seems harsh.

Good luck with your thread mate you are going to need it ;)
Sgurr
Member
Posts: 2168
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:22 pm
Dogs: Peggy Sue

Re: Improving the breed..........

Post by Sgurr »

Hi elcourtbayspringers,

From your comments on a different thread, the dog in the picture with the wild boar earlier is a great grandson of Bridevalley Hothead.

Sgurr
User avatar
elcourtbayspringers
Member
Posts: 208
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 8:46 pm
Dogs: Bella, Bay, Pip, Blossom, Teal
Location: Northants
Contact:

Re: Improving the breed..........

Post by elcourtbayspringers »

Really? he was a cracking dog, Hothead was a good name for him as he was a strong willed bugger, mind you so is Ian according to Pete Masters 'they were a good pair'! :-)
trekmoor
Member
Posts: 16074
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 9:38 am
Dogs: Too many and not enough !
Location: Central Scotland

Re: Improving the breed..........

Post by trekmoor »

The idea of a testing scheme separate from field trials for HPR's in this country has been on the go for years now. It has never really got off the starting blocks. I think much the same would apply to any other gundog breed.

So many of these "tests" depend more on how good the trainer is rather than on how good the dog is. If I felt I had a good springer and wanted to put it through such tests but knew I wasn't up to those levels of training I could not afford to hand the dog over to a pro trainer and have him do the training and the handling in the tests. That would be my dog out of any breeding scheme connected to the tests.

If natural ability is what counts then a dog that loves hunting and likes retrieving, isn't gunshy, noisy or hardmouthed is maybe all that needs to be tested for ?

Things like steadiness and handling are more to do with training ability than with natural ability though I would agree that some dogs are more "biddable" than others . On the other hand the more biddable dogs may lack the hunt drive required so we are back to needing trainers good enough to keep the hard going dogs in check and moving away from the "natural ability" dogs once more. :think: :doh:
I.M.O. the "average shooting man" is incapable of keeping control of the really hard going "hunting machines." He probably wouldn't even want one ! Just like with trial dogs he'd be better suited to a dog that is not quite of trial winning quality.

Wullie
If at first you don't succeed .....find out if there is a booby prize !
-----------------------------------------------------
Don't do what doesn't work - do what does.
.
Hales Smut
Member
Posts: 64
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2011 8:54 pm

Re: Improving the breed..........

Post by Hales Smut »

Bridevalley spaniels were about the best I have ever seen. A pitty that Mr Toomey stopt breeding spaniels. Bridevalley and Sprucehill were/are very similar. Sprucehill Alfie was the sire of Meonview Woodlark who was Robinsmoor Frolic's sire. Mr Bateson trained and sold Frolic but also brought Hothead from Ireland to the UK. A friend of mine had Bridevalley Hector a litter brother to Nell, Hotheads mother. Hector was the dog that made me look around in Ireland. The Bridevalley dogs were truly linebred to strong hunting material. I have seen pedigrees with 7 times the foundation bitch in it. We realy could do with them now.
I do not think it's necessary to breed to FTch's. I use the dog that pleases me, FTch or not. I never make compromises in the hunting department. Only fire on fire. I've shot woodcock in West Ireland over my friends dogs wich have the same lines as mine. Going back to strong Monalue hunting stuff. Those dogs hunt glens and slopes in the hardest of cover for woodcock. Not a lot of scent and going strong every day of the season. When you stand in the bottom, they are not affraid to clean out the slope in front of you and get 50/60 metres aways from you. They come back when called. True spaniel work at his best.
If somebody is out there who has dogs with 3/4 lines going back to Hothead, just give a shout. I'll be more than happy to answer.
Hales Smut
Member
Posts: 64
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2011 8:54 pm

Re: Improving the breed..........

Post by Hales Smut »

Trekmoor. You hit the nail on the head. Trials, also, are more a test of the trainer than the dog. I think that's the reason why the breeds goes down. Trials should be a test of natural qualities, they are the only which are heriditary. Trainability depends on the trainer. David Lisset will get further with dog X than the average man would, but in genetics it's the same dog.
User avatar
Hepe
Member
Posts: 3604
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 2:24 pm
Dogs: IWS, labrador and a cocker
Location: Sweden

Re: Improving the breed..........

Post by Hepe »

Hales Smut wrote:Bridevalley spaniels were about the best I have ever seen. A pitty that Mr Toomey stopt breeding spaniels. Bridevalley and Sprucehill were/are very similar. Sprucehill Alfie was the sire of Meonview Woodlark who was Robinsmoor Frolic's sire. Mr Bateson trained and sold Frolic but also brought Hothead from Ireland to the UK. A friend of mine had Bridevalley Hector a litter brother to Nell, Hotheads mother. Hector was the dog that made me look around in Ireland. The Bridevalley dogs were truly linebred to strong hunting material. I have seen pedigrees with 7 times the foundation bitch in it. We realy could do with them now.
I do not think it's necessary to breed to FTch's. I use the dog that pleases me, FTch or not. I never make compromises in the hunting department. Only fire on fire. I've shot woodcock in West Ireland over my friends dogs wich have the same lines as mine. Going back to strong Monalue hunting stuff. Those dogs hunt glens and slopes in the hardest of cover for woodcock. Not a lot of scent and going strong every day of the season. When you stand in the bottom, they are not affraid to clean out the slope in front of you and get 50/60 metres aways from you. They come back when called. True spaniel work at his best.
If somebody is out there who has dogs with 3/4 lines going back to Hothead, just give a shout. I'll be more than happy to answer.
I had to peek around a bit at pedigrees after reading your post. I'm always a wee bit suspicious when old men speak about old dogs. Often the dogs get better the longer they've been dead, not sure the same goes for old men, i haven't lost any yet but i bet it would fall under the same category. :mrgreen: If you know what you want and think you know what you do, a title is not really needed i suppose. You know the lines, can track them and see when a good combination you believe in will be about.

However, I've been out and about at pickups and hunts enough to know that a lot of those glorified hard hunting dogs owned by people 'never bothering with silly competitions¨often carry a lot of unwanted traits. They might work all day i give you that but... What *i* want is biddable, easily trained hard hunting dogs. In Sweden we call such a thing a tulipanaros but I'm confident it's worth trying for. Hence i DO believe in tests and trials as well as i do believe that the same dog should be able to do honest work out hunting. It's not at all tricky to let your trial dog eat ground and go 50/60 meters, even i managed that as a newbie spaniel owner. It's way too easy, not sure why you glorify that??

Hmm not sure what i wanted to say with my reply really, mostly rambling before getting to the point, sowwy. :oops: I did check pedigrees and it seems we got some nice interesting pups coming on here in Sweden partly from the lines you seem to like. I'll keep an eye on them and come back admitting you were right in a year or two maybe. :-D

http://www.rasdata.nu/springer/stam/6/00006056.htm

Helene
Image
paul spaniel
Member
Posts: 1474
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 8:45 am

Re: Improving the breed..........

Post by paul spaniel »

Hales Smut wrote:Bridevalley spaniels were about the best I have ever seen. A pitty that Mr Toomey stopt breeding spaniels. Bridevalley and Sprucehill were/are very similar. Sprucehill Alfie was the sire of Meonview Woodlark who was Robinsmoor Frolic's sire. Mr Bateson trained and sold Frolic but also brought Hothead from Ireland to the UK. A friend of mine had Bridevalley Hector a litter brother to Nell, Hotheads mother. Hector was the dog that made me look around in Ireland. The Bridevalley dogs were truly linebred to strong hunting material. I have seen pedigrees with 7 times the foundation bitch in it. We realy could do with them now.
I do not think it's necessary to breed to FTch's. I use the dog that pleases me, FTch or not. I never make compromises in the hunting department. Only fire on fire. I've shot woodcock in West Ireland over my friends dogs wich have the same lines as mine. Going back to strong Monalue hunting stuff. Those dogs hunt glens and slopes in the hardest of cover for woodcock. Not a lot of scent and going strong every day of the season. When you stand in the bottom, they are not affraid to clean out the slope in front of you and get 50/60 metres aways from you. They come back when called. True spaniel work at his best.
If somebody is out there who has dogs with 3/4 lines going back to Hothead, just give a shout. I'll be more than happy to answer.
hales smut i like alot off what u say but my shotgun only kills 30-40 metres max, dogs flushing 50-60 metres aint what im after..
Sgurr
Member
Posts: 2168
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:22 pm
Dogs: Peggy Sue

Re: Improving the breed..........

Post by Sgurr »

Halaze Hickory of Edgegrove is still around, son of Bridevalley Hothead, so I think that may be the nearest to those lines.
Rothievale is in England at the moment mating her bitch to him (unless she changes her mind again :) )

Sgurr
Hales Smut
Member
Posts: 64
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2011 8:54 pm

Re: Improving the breed..........

Post by Hales Smut »

Old? It all depends on what you call old? Middle aged I would say. I have 3 Belg FT ch bitches and 2 Int Ftch Bitches in homologation in my Kennels. Alive and kicking.
That Irish woodcockgrounds don't always allow to get in and get close. Those rather steep slopes of these valleys full of thorns, don't allow you to get in yourself. You stand in the bottom and wait till the dogs push a bird and hope it comes in shotgun range. Spaniel work at his best.
I imported diffrent dogs from diffrent lines ( about 5 or 6 ) from the UK and up to know all were disapointments. I like a 4/5 month old pup, the moment he scents game, enter cover(brambles) and hunt it. If he did that 3/4 times I don't want to click him in again. I want him to hunt the cover without any stimulation and without me encouraging him to get in.
That's what almost all Bridevalleys, that I saw, did.
Post Reply