Re: reflections and redirections
Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2013 10:46 pm
Hi Neil, If you mean the two men who offered to take me and Lady down to the Retriever Championships with them then the answer is I can no longer remember their names !
I think one of them is still in the land of the living though and is possibly still trialing. Both men came from the Inverness area and not from Forfar and both men were about the same age as me but I'm not telling anyone what age that is !
Here is the next instalment.
....................................................................................................................................................
As a test dog Lady was just next door to useless but Tessa was still a very good bitch. She had developed one fault over the years and that was that Tessa could no longer be trusted to always pick up the dummy if she thought there was game nearby.
In one test she was to go for a simple marked retrieve over shortish grass with just a few odd patches of higher, rougher grass about halfway out to the retrieve but the grass clumps were off by about 5 yards to one side from the "true line" of a dogs run out to the marked retrieve. They should not have interfered with the dogs mark. I was about 8th or 9th dog to do this test and I thought it looked a doddle. Tessa was the best marking dog I have ever owned and was also the best handling dog I have ever owned.
The dummy was thrown and Tessa was sent. She broke off hard to the right partway up her run out route , went into the rougher grass and flushed out a rabbit then promptly sat , spaniel fashion, to watch it run away. I waved my arm and she completed the rest of the retrieve in textbook fashion. I thought we'd lose a lot of marks but the test judge was an old gamekeeper with old fashioned ideas ! He gave Tessa full marks plus 2 !!! He told me he'd noticed the rabbit while setting up the test but had left it in it's couch ..." Just to see what would happen." He was scathing of any dog that would run straight past strong game scent ," Just to pick up a lump of canvas ." He was, in short, my kind of judge !!!
Tessa won that test mainly thanks to him though I don't think his "marking system" was very fair to the dogs that ran after Tessa had cleared the ground of rabbits, they had no chance to emulate her performance.
I think she competed in about 3 Interclub Tests and my club won all three of those tests. One of the individual tests held one sunny Sunday had the best rabbit distraction I have ever seen in a test ....... far better than the usual " elasticated rabbits." The competitors were all kept on the far side of a thick strip of trees and were called forward one by one to the judges. They were standing on a dead straight grassy track through the woods. At the end of the woods and the track about 50-60 yards away was a wire mesh fence and an upward sloping grassy field beyond it with a pile of hay bales on it.
From where we all were we could not see any of this but as the dogs were called forward one by one we could hear a lot of panicked whistling , some shouting and a lot of laughter from the judges and from the competitors who had already done this test and who could now get a laugh at the others still to take part.
I went forward when called for with my whistle at the ready.....it was obvious something unusual was going on over there ! I was informed by the judges that the retrieve was a mark over the fence that would fall in the grassy field that formed the slight slope of the hill. That was all I was told. A shot was fired , a dummy was thrown and Tessa was sent. She had that dummy well marked and went for it at full speed ahead. As she was in the air going over the fence , a remotely controlled "rabbit" which was really a sort of 4x4 model truck covered in rabbit skin with a rabbits tail attached to it's rear antennae was set in motion. It bumped and hustled over the short turf and then vanished into a deliberately made hole among the hay bales.
I blew stop and having made sure the rabbit was safely gone I then commanded Tessa to fetch the dummy which she did but not without first having a very thoughtful look at where the rabbit had gone. To me it looked and acted just like a rabbit and an awful lot of the dogs thought so too ! I now joined the other spectators to laugh at the misfortunes of the other handlers. One lab was really determined to get that rabbit . He was busy demolishing the pile of hay bales to get to it when the rabbit's "owner" intervened to save his very expertly operated model truck from being reduced to wheels and springs !
By the end of that Interclub Test two or three of the clubs were just about level as far as marks were concerned and it would all depend on the very last test as to which club won. Every point gained or lost counted and tensions began to rise among the handlers. I was the last member of my team to compete and it all came down to how well Tessa completed this test section.
The test was a blind retrieve during which the competitor and the judges stood in the bottom of a shallow valley . A dummy was placed on top of the plateau over the crest of the valley's slope. Neither the handler or the judges would be able to see if the dog was in the area of the dummy for neither they nor the handlers could see a damned thing. It was a test designed to see if the dogs would hunt a large area when told to by an unseen handler. The other competitors could, however, see every move the dog made for they sat on the grass of the other side of the little valley and had a high vantage point.
Tessa was sent for the dummy and over the crest of the little hill she went so I called out , "Hi Lost !" and hoped she found the dummy quickly up there. A few more seconds passed by but still Tess did not appear with the dummy or without it for that matter. I began to get anxious and repeated the "Hi-lost!" command in order to encourage her . One of the judges said not to worry too much about the time taken for it was a large field up there and the test was meant to see if the dogs would continue hunting.
After about 4-5 minutes of "Hi-losting" and worrying, Tessa came back over the hill crest with the dummy. "There ye are ," said the judge, "told you not to worry. I'll give you 18 out of 20 for that." I was the last dog to go and I thought the 18 points should be enough to ensure a win for my team so I rejoined the other competitors with a smile all over my face.
The other teams were not just smiling too, they were actually laughing ! My own team was looking distinctly dischuffed however so I asked what was wrong . Apparently, from the high view point of the competitors on the hillside ,it could be seen that Tessa had at once found the dummy but had looked at it and then blinked it. She then set off across that field, jumped the far fence and went to take a bloody good look at the hay bales where the "rabbit" had vanished during the first test in the morning !!! She'd remembered that rabbit for about 6 hours and despite not knowing that ground at all had somehow recognized she was within about 200 yards of it in the next field !
She'd ran all the way out there, took a good look and sniff at the hay bales then made the return journey casually picking up the dummy en-route back to me ! Neither I nor the judges had known she'd done that but when I collapsed in laughter my team mates weren't too pleased until I told them that because the judges hadn't seen what they'd seen, she had been given 18 points for the retrieve so we had won the test ! The other competitors thought I was joking at first but when they came to know this was true they too laughed ....or most of them did anyway !
Tests were "different" back then, folk seemed to have a better sense of what was funny !
In another Interclub Test a blind retrieve had been set up over about 100 yards of very rough grass and rashes galore plus a few little bushes. We were to send our dogs for this blind while all the competitors still to take part remained behind a little grassy hummock to ensure no dog could possibly see the dummy being placed. Back then handling was pretty much in it's infancy and that length of blind retrieve over that sort of ground was pretty well guaranteed to need a bit of extra handling on the dogs' way out to the retrieve. A fair amount of whistling and arm waving was the norm.
When it came to Tessa's turn she took my initial direction from heel perfectly as she almost always did , went out like a rocket all the way to the dummy with no deviation on her part and no handling on mine, picked up the dummy as if it was waving a flag at her and returned at the gallop. It was a "full marks" retrieve , no doubt about it but a couple of the judges did have doubts. They said no dog could do such a determined , fast outrun directly onto a blind retrieve among that degree of cover unless the dog had seen the dummy being placed. I was suspected of cheating.
One of the 4 judges had been over the pond looking at American gundog trials and he stepped in to say he'd seen American labs do blinds like that but Tessa was the first one he'd ever seen do it in Britain. The man was a highly respected "A" Panel judge so the other judges did not argue with him but they did go to the competitors still waiting to compete behind the hummock to ask if I'd moved away from them at any time prior to my retrieve. They told the judges I had been with them the whole time so Tessa was given full marks but the fact I'd been accused of cheating still rankled ! In fact I felt, though I did not say so, that the dogs who had also gained full marks after needing an extra command should maybe lose a point or two !
It was, I think, following that test that quite a few of the younger trial handlers came to me to ask how I trained dogs to do blinds. ...... Most trial handlers back then had never even heard of an "Obedience " arena Send-Away exercise which is all a blind retrieve really is except that a blind retrieve is often done over far greater distances with cover getting in the way and with a retrieve lying there as a reward at the end of it.
In a spaniel test I competed in with my cocker Charlie about 3-4 years ago ,he too did a blind retrieve that made one of the judges ask me if I'd cheated and had practiced with Charlie over the pre-set course during the night ! He was very suspicious ! ..... That was about 30 years later however so it can wait it's turn in this story.
Wullie
Here is the next instalment.
....................................................................................................................................................
As a test dog Lady was just next door to useless but Tessa was still a very good bitch. She had developed one fault over the years and that was that Tessa could no longer be trusted to always pick up the dummy if she thought there was game nearby.
In one test she was to go for a simple marked retrieve over shortish grass with just a few odd patches of higher, rougher grass about halfway out to the retrieve but the grass clumps were off by about 5 yards to one side from the "true line" of a dogs run out to the marked retrieve. They should not have interfered with the dogs mark. I was about 8th or 9th dog to do this test and I thought it looked a doddle. Tessa was the best marking dog I have ever owned and was also the best handling dog I have ever owned.
The dummy was thrown and Tessa was sent. She broke off hard to the right partway up her run out route , went into the rougher grass and flushed out a rabbit then promptly sat , spaniel fashion, to watch it run away. I waved my arm and she completed the rest of the retrieve in textbook fashion. I thought we'd lose a lot of marks but the test judge was an old gamekeeper with old fashioned ideas ! He gave Tessa full marks plus 2 !!! He told me he'd noticed the rabbit while setting up the test but had left it in it's couch ..." Just to see what would happen." He was scathing of any dog that would run straight past strong game scent ," Just to pick up a lump of canvas ." He was, in short, my kind of judge !!!
Tessa won that test mainly thanks to him though I don't think his "marking system" was very fair to the dogs that ran after Tessa had cleared the ground of rabbits, they had no chance to emulate her performance.
I think she competed in about 3 Interclub Tests and my club won all three of those tests. One of the individual tests held one sunny Sunday had the best rabbit distraction I have ever seen in a test ....... far better than the usual " elasticated rabbits." The competitors were all kept on the far side of a thick strip of trees and were called forward one by one to the judges. They were standing on a dead straight grassy track through the woods. At the end of the woods and the track about 50-60 yards away was a wire mesh fence and an upward sloping grassy field beyond it with a pile of hay bales on it.
From where we all were we could not see any of this but as the dogs were called forward one by one we could hear a lot of panicked whistling , some shouting and a lot of laughter from the judges and from the competitors who had already done this test and who could now get a laugh at the others still to take part.
I went forward when called for with my whistle at the ready.....it was obvious something unusual was going on over there ! I was informed by the judges that the retrieve was a mark over the fence that would fall in the grassy field that formed the slight slope of the hill. That was all I was told. A shot was fired , a dummy was thrown and Tessa was sent. She had that dummy well marked and went for it at full speed ahead. As she was in the air going over the fence , a remotely controlled "rabbit" which was really a sort of 4x4 model truck covered in rabbit skin with a rabbits tail attached to it's rear antennae was set in motion. It bumped and hustled over the short turf and then vanished into a deliberately made hole among the hay bales.
I blew stop and having made sure the rabbit was safely gone I then commanded Tessa to fetch the dummy which she did but not without first having a very thoughtful look at where the rabbit had gone. To me it looked and acted just like a rabbit and an awful lot of the dogs thought so too ! I now joined the other spectators to laugh at the misfortunes of the other handlers. One lab was really determined to get that rabbit . He was busy demolishing the pile of hay bales to get to it when the rabbit's "owner" intervened to save his very expertly operated model truck from being reduced to wheels and springs !
By the end of that Interclub Test two or three of the clubs were just about level as far as marks were concerned and it would all depend on the very last test as to which club won. Every point gained or lost counted and tensions began to rise among the handlers. I was the last member of my team to compete and it all came down to how well Tessa completed this test section.
The test was a blind retrieve during which the competitor and the judges stood in the bottom of a shallow valley . A dummy was placed on top of the plateau over the crest of the valley's slope. Neither the handler or the judges would be able to see if the dog was in the area of the dummy for neither they nor the handlers could see a damned thing. It was a test designed to see if the dogs would hunt a large area when told to by an unseen handler. The other competitors could, however, see every move the dog made for they sat on the grass of the other side of the little valley and had a high vantage point.
Tessa was sent for the dummy and over the crest of the little hill she went so I called out , "Hi Lost !" and hoped she found the dummy quickly up there. A few more seconds passed by but still Tess did not appear with the dummy or without it for that matter. I began to get anxious and repeated the "Hi-lost!" command in order to encourage her . One of the judges said not to worry too much about the time taken for it was a large field up there and the test was meant to see if the dogs would continue hunting.
After about 4-5 minutes of "Hi-losting" and worrying, Tessa came back over the hill crest with the dummy. "There ye are ," said the judge, "told you not to worry. I'll give you 18 out of 20 for that." I was the last dog to go and I thought the 18 points should be enough to ensure a win for my team so I rejoined the other competitors with a smile all over my face.
The other teams were not just smiling too, they were actually laughing ! My own team was looking distinctly dischuffed however so I asked what was wrong . Apparently, from the high view point of the competitors on the hillside ,it could be seen that Tessa had at once found the dummy but had looked at it and then blinked it. She then set off across that field, jumped the far fence and went to take a bloody good look at the hay bales where the "rabbit" had vanished during the first test in the morning !!! She'd remembered that rabbit for about 6 hours and despite not knowing that ground at all had somehow recognized she was within about 200 yards of it in the next field !
She'd ran all the way out there, took a good look and sniff at the hay bales then made the return journey casually picking up the dummy en-route back to me ! Neither I nor the judges had known she'd done that but when I collapsed in laughter my team mates weren't too pleased until I told them that because the judges hadn't seen what they'd seen, she had been given 18 points for the retrieve so we had won the test ! The other competitors thought I was joking at first but when they came to know this was true they too laughed ....or most of them did anyway !
Tests were "different" back then, folk seemed to have a better sense of what was funny !
In another Interclub Test a blind retrieve had been set up over about 100 yards of very rough grass and rashes galore plus a few little bushes. We were to send our dogs for this blind while all the competitors still to take part remained behind a little grassy hummock to ensure no dog could possibly see the dummy being placed. Back then handling was pretty much in it's infancy and that length of blind retrieve over that sort of ground was pretty well guaranteed to need a bit of extra handling on the dogs' way out to the retrieve. A fair amount of whistling and arm waving was the norm.
When it came to Tessa's turn she took my initial direction from heel perfectly as she almost always did , went out like a rocket all the way to the dummy with no deviation on her part and no handling on mine, picked up the dummy as if it was waving a flag at her and returned at the gallop. It was a "full marks" retrieve , no doubt about it but a couple of the judges did have doubts. They said no dog could do such a determined , fast outrun directly onto a blind retrieve among that degree of cover unless the dog had seen the dummy being placed. I was suspected of cheating.
One of the 4 judges had been over the pond looking at American gundog trials and he stepped in to say he'd seen American labs do blinds like that but Tessa was the first one he'd ever seen do it in Britain. The man was a highly respected "A" Panel judge so the other judges did not argue with him but they did go to the competitors still waiting to compete behind the hummock to ask if I'd moved away from them at any time prior to my retrieve. They told the judges I had been with them the whole time so Tessa was given full marks but the fact I'd been accused of cheating still rankled ! In fact I felt, though I did not say so, that the dogs who had also gained full marks after needing an extra command should maybe lose a point or two !
It was, I think, following that test that quite a few of the younger trial handlers came to me to ask how I trained dogs to do blinds. ...... Most trial handlers back then had never even heard of an "Obedience " arena Send-Away exercise which is all a blind retrieve really is except that a blind retrieve is often done over far greater distances with cover getting in the way and with a retrieve lying there as a reward at the end of it.
In a spaniel test I competed in with my cocker Charlie about 3-4 years ago ,he too did a blind retrieve that made one of the judges ask me if I'd cheated and had practiced with Charlie over the pre-set course during the night ! He was very suspicious ! ..... That was about 30 years later however so it can wait it's turn in this story.
Wullie